{
 "count": 15,
 "cases": [
  {
   "id": "A-0001",
   "num": "A-0001",
   "title": "业委会秘书“八个严禁”制度边界",
   "category": "A 基层治理",
   "scene": "制度边界",
   "interface": "方舟（底线守护）",
   "lever": "划底线",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "方舟",
     "anchor": "arking"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对业委会秘书角色法规依据不足、职责泛化、利益冲突风险显现的困局，制度设计者不追求一步到位立法，而是以负面清单形式划出八条不可触碰的行为底线，用“方舟操作”先守住资金、信息、决策权等核心功能，为后续规范管理提供基础性制度支撑。",
   "source": "公开报道",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/A-0001.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "A-0002",
   "num": "A-0002",
   "title": "鲸鱼大楼酬金制账目困局",
   "category": "A 基层治理",
   "scene": "账目与资金",
   "interface": "疏浚（源头改造）",
   "lever": "开信息",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对酬金制小区物业不公开账目、业主拒缴物业费的恶性循环，业委会秘书不直接对抗物业，而是通过强制分项公开、组建业主志愿者核查小组、建立共管账户，把道德质问转化为技术核对，以公开促信任，重建缴费意愿。",
   "source": "公开报道",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/A-0002.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "A-0003",
   "num": "A-0003",
   "title": "长白229街坊充电桩困局",
   "category": "A 基层治理",
   "scene": "公共收益与设施",
   "interface": "疏浚（源头改造）",
   "lever": "改路径",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对老旧小区新能源车充电需求激增、私拉电线安全隐患突出、电力容量不足的困局，社区工作者不禁止、不放任，而是统一规划共享充电方案，引入运营商负责安装维护收费，把个体需求转化为公共资源分配问题，在空间与电力双重约束下实现安全与刚需的平衡。",
   "source": "公开报道",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/A-0003.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "A-0004",
   "num": "A-0004",
   "title": "九里片区“九合一”拆墙并院困局",
   "category": "A 基层治理",
   "scene": "空间改造与合并",
   "interface": "疏浚（源头改造）",
   "lever": "排次序",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对九个院落拆墙并院时居民对“改后利益受损”的想象，牵头人不硬推、不投票、不搞一刀切，而是按“先做通谁、再带动谁”的次序，先立骨干示范，再一户一策回应停车、采光等具体顾虑，并以“同心亭”面对面协商、“三尺巷”式互换促成各退一步，把利益受损的想象转化为可当面交换的具体利益，适用于分歧在“改后利益分配”而非“改不改”、且有可动员骨干的场景。",
   "source": "公开报道",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/A-0004.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0001",
   "num": "B-0001",
   "title": "瞒天过海",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "信号层（祭祀逆向）",
   "lever": "藏信息",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "祭祀",
     "anchor": "sacrificing"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对对方情报网络严密、正面行动风险过高的局面，决策者不秘密行动、不正面对抗，而是把真实意图隐藏在公开常规动作中，管理对方的信号识别阈值，使其“常见则不疑”，在对方意怠窗口内完成关键部署，以最小成本实现目标。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0001.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0002",
   "num": "B-0002",
   "title": "围魏救赵",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "疏浚（改变压力流向）",
   "lever": "改优先级",
   "date": "2026-09-27",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对正面救援成本过高、坐视不救又危及自身存续的两难，决策者不直接赴援，而是攻击对方必救的薄弱环节，迫使其主动改变部署，以间接路线解除危机，同时保全自身实力。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0002.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0003",
   "num": "B-0003",
   "title": "借刀杀人",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "疏浚（转换出力者）",
   "lever": "借第三方",
   "date": "2026-09-28",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对敌人已明、正面出手损耗巨大而第三方态度未定的局面，决策者不亲自出手、不与第三方正面结盟，而是识别并激化第三方与敌人之间的矛盾，诱导第三方出手（引友杀敌），借第三方之力削弱敌人，自己保存实力、坐收其成。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0003.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0004",
   "num": "B-0004",
   "title": "以逸待劳",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "分层异步（等对方动能衰减）",
   "lever": "等衰减",
   "date": "2026-09-29",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "分层异步",
     "anchor": "layered-asynchrony"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对敌方主动进攻、锐气正盛而正面迎击损耗巨大的局面，决策者不主动出击、不消极避战，而是退守有利态势、养精蓄锐，等待对方攻势的衰减拐点（锐气耗尽、补给不济），再以逸击劳、一击致命，适用于己方有地势与时间资本、敌方劳师袭远不可持久的场景。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0004.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0005",
   "num": "B-0005",
   "title": "趁火打劫",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "响应缺口（趁对方响应崩溃）",
   "lever": "乘危机",
   "date": "2026-09-30",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "响应缺口",
     "anchor": "response-gap"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对敌方已陷入内乱、无暇他顾的窗口，决策者不正面强攻、不点火造势，而是识别敌方因危机暴露的存续命脉，就势出手夺取本属于敌方的利益，得手即收、不引火烧身，适用于敌方危机为“真火”、且火势不会反噬自身的场景。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0005.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0006",
   "num": "B-0006",
   "title": "声东击西",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "响应错位（引导对方部署错位）",
   "lever": "调兵力",
   "date": "2026-10-01",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "响应缺口",
     "anchor": "response-gap"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对敌方重兵防守真实目标、正面强攻受挫的局面，决策者不硬攻真目标、不真打假方向，而是制造声势逼真的假动作（声东）把敌方防守引到错误方向，再趁真实目标空虚突然转攻（击西），适用于敌方有明确防守重点、真假目标存在空间差、假信号能调动对方的场景。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0006.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0007",
   "num": "B-0007",
   "title": "无中生有",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "响应钝化（磨钝对方敏感度）",
   "lever": "养脱敏",
   "date": "2026-10-02",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "响应缺口",
     "anchor": "response-gap"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对箭矢耗尽、正面无法补充的绝境，决策者不硬拼、不硬守，而是先用假信号（草人）骗得真利（箭），再用假信号的反复磨钝对方的警觉，最后用真动作（敢死队）乘虚突袭，适用于对方有可被反复假信号磨钝的固定响应、且真假难辨的场景。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0007.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0008",
   "num": "B-0008",
   "title": "暗渡陈仓",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "响应锁定（被钉在假方向）",
   "lever": "铺明线",
   "date": "2026-10-03",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "响应缺口",
     "anchor": "response-gap"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "面对正面栈道断绝、对方重兵把守的困境，决策者不硬修栈道、不坐守，而是用明修栈道把对方的注意力锁死，再从偏僻的陈仓道暗渡突袭，适用于对方有明确的、可被锁定的关注点、且存在对方忽视的暗路的场景。与声东击西的区别是：声东击西是调动对方移动，暗渡陈仓是锁定对方不动。",
   "source": "三十六计原文",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0008.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "B-0009",
   "num": "B-0009",
   "title": "隔岸观火",
   "category": "B 历史判例",
   "scene": "博弈决策",
   "interface": "结构判断（系统边界）",
   "lever": "划系统边界",
   "date": "2026-10-04",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "结构判断",
     "anchor": "structural-judgment"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "袁绍死后二子相争，曹操按兵不动、坐观内斗。精妙不在不动手，而在划清系统边界——看准火在“袁家子系统”里烧、自己不在其内，才敢隔岸；等二袁自耗殆尽，逐个击破。",
   "source": "《三国志·魏书·袁绍传》《后汉书·袁绍刘表列传》等",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/B-0009.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "C-0001",
   "num": "C-0001",
   "title": "OpenAI 解雇风波",
   "category": "C 企业管理",
   "scene": "组织治理",
   "interface": "祭祀（承重误判）",
   "lever": "辨节点",
   "date": "2026-10-01",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "祭祀",
     "anchor": "sacrificing"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "2023 年 OpenAI 董事会以\"沟通破裂\"为由解雇 CEO Sam Altman，引发员工与投资者全体反弹、Altman 数日内复职。这篇判例显影这场失败决策：董事会以为在\"换一个高管\"，实际上在\"拔掉缝合点\"——动手前没问清 Altman 是\"可替换零件\"还是\"承重墙\"。适用：动关键人物前，先判断他是\"结构缝合点\"还是\"可替换部件\"。",
   "source": "《Why AI Governance Must Be Dynamic: Pattern Continuity as the Ontological Ground for Diagnostic Governance》（DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7453298）＋ OpenAI 官方公告",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/C-0001.html"
  },
  {
   "id": "C-0002",
   "num": "C-0002",
   "title": "DeepSeek 开源决策",
   "category": "C 企业管理",
   "scene": "战略抉择",
   "interface": "疏浚（开源造河道）",
   "lever": "放技术",
   "date": "2026-10-02",
   "concepts": [
    {
     "name": "疏浚",
     "anchor": "dredging"
    }
   ],
   "abstract": "DeepSeek 在算力受限、资本受限的条件下，选择把最强模型完全开源，而非跟随行业闭源惯例。核心判断是：闭源护城河短暂，开源能建立生态引力；只赚\"六倍利润\"、不追求最大化，开源与商业可持续不冲突。结果 R1 成为全球最受欢迎开源模型，公司首轮融资估值约 520 亿美元。",
   "source": "梁文锋投资人会议实录（2026年）＋ 梁文锋早期访谈（2024年）＋ DeepSeek 官方公告",
   "url": "https://zhishuixue.com/cases/C-0002.html"
  }
 ]
}